>> index 3995f54..f1e7d45 100644 >> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c >> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c >> @@ -1527,8 +1527,7 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) >> out: >> mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); >> >> - if (probed_mod) >> - module_put(probed_mod); >> + module_put(probed_mod); > > This is OK, but I you request a comment line over there so that > code reader can understand it is safe to pass a NULL pointer to > module_put().
Do you want that I replace the shown null pointer check by a short comment which repeats an expectation for the affected function call? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
