>>>>> "DL" == David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DL> just wanted to point out that recent news shows that sha1 isn't as
DL> good as it was thought to be (far easier to deliberatly create
DL> collisions then it should be)
I suspect there is no need to do so...
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga..
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
...
Linus
(*) yeah, yeah, I know about the current theoretical case, and I don't
care. Not only is it theoretical, the way my objects are packed you'd have
to not just generate the same SHA1 for it, it would have to _also_ still
be a valid zlib object _and_ get the header to match the "type + length"
of object part. IOW, the object validity checks are actually even stricter
than just "sha1 matches".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
