On 2014/11/14 5:59, Tejun Heo wrote:
> When a subsystem is offlined, its entry on @cgrp->subsys[] is cleared
> asynchronously.  If cgroup_subtree_control_write() is requested to
> enable the subsystem again before the entry is cleared, it has to wait
> for the previous offlining to finish and clear the @cgrp->subsys[]
> entry before trying to enable the subsystem again.
> 
> This is currently done while verifying the input enable / disable
> parameters.  This used to be correct but f63070d350e3 ("cgroup: make
> interface files visible iff enabled on cgroup->subtree_control")
> breaks it.  The commit is one of the commits implementing subsystem
> dependency.
> 
> Through subsystem dependency, some subsystems may be enabled and
> disabled implicitly in addition to the explicitly requested ones.  The
> actual subsystems to be enabled and disabled are determined during
> @css_enable/disable calculation.  The current offline wait logic skips
> the ones which are already implicitly enabled and then waits for
> subsystems in @enable; however, this misses the subsystems which may
> be implicitly enabled through dependency from @enable.  If such
> implicitly subsystem hasn't yet finished offlining yet, the function
> ends up trying to create a css when its @cgrp->subsys[] slot is
> already occupied triggering BUG_ON() in init_and_link_css().
> 
> Fix it by moving the wait logic after @css_enable is calculated and
> waiting for all the subsystems in @css_enable.  This fixes the above
> bug as the mask contains all subsystems which are to be enabled
> including the ones enabled through dependencies.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> Fixes: f63070d350e3 ("cgroup: make interface files visible iff enabled on 
> cgroup->subtree_control")

For all 3 patches:

Acked-by: Zefan Li <lize...@huawei.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to