Passing the 'other' tty to tty_release_checks() only makes sense
for a pty pair; make o_tty scope local instead.

Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <a...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index 4034e5e..c765260 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -1702,8 +1702,7 @@ static void release_tty(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx)
  *     Performs some paranoid checking before true release of the @tty.
  *     This is a no-op unless TTY_PARANOIA_CHECK is defined.
  */
-static int tty_release_checks(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *o_tty,
-               int idx)
+static int tty_release_checks(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx)
 {
 #ifdef TTY_PARANOIA_CHECK
        if (idx < 0 || idx >= tty->driver->num) {
@@ -1722,6 +1721,8 @@ static int tty_release_checks(struct tty_struct *tty, 
struct tty_struct *o_tty,
                return -1;
        }
        if (tty->driver->other) {
+               struct tty_struct *o_tty = tty->link;
+
                if (o_tty != tty->driver->other->ttys[idx]) {
                        printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: other->table[%d] not o_tty for 
(%s)\n",
                                        __func__, idx, tty->name);
@@ -1779,7 +1780,7 @@ int tty_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
        /* Review: parallel close */
        o_tty = tty->link;
 
-       if (tty_release_checks(tty, o_tty, idx)) {
+       if (tty_release_checks(tty, idx)) {
                tty_unlock(tty);
                return 0;
        }
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to