Holding tty_mutex is no longer required to serialize changes to
the tty_count or to prevent concurrent opens of closing ttys;
tty_lock() is sufficient.

Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <a...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index 49167ed..f1c4b07 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -1806,10 +1806,6 @@ int tty_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
         * each iteration we avoid any problems.
         */
        while (1) {
-               /* Guard against races with tty->count changes elsewhere and
-                  opens on /dev/tty */
-
-               mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
                tty_lock_pair(tty, o_tty);
                tty_closing = tty->count <= 1;
                o_tty_closing = o_tty &&
@@ -1845,7 +1841,6 @@ int tty_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
                               __func__, tty_name(tty, buf));
                }
                tty_unlock_pair(tty, o_tty);
-               mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
                schedule_timeout_killable(timeout);
                if (timeout < 120 * HZ)
                        timeout = 2 * timeout + 1;
@@ -1900,7 +1895,6 @@ int tty_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
                read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
        }
 
-       mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
        tty_unlock_pair(tty, o_tty);
        /* At this point, the tty->count == 0 should ensure a dead tty
           cannot be re-opened by a racing opener */
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to