* Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 28.10.14 at 12:18, <tip...@zytor.com> wrote:
> > Commit-ID: a425cf83e39f99a70168c184e79cea8c67ba7c12
> > Gitweb:
> > http://git.kernel.org/tip/a425cf83e39f99a70168c184e79cea8c67ba7c12
> > Author: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> > AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:44:24 +0100
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> > CommitDate: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:01:09 +0100
> >
> > ix86: Fix build failure when !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> >
> > mp_should_keep_irq() isn't really IO-APIC related, and
> > considering that it's being used solely in arch/x86/pci/ likely
> > both declaration and definition got misplaced even without
> > considering the resulting build failure:
> >
> > .../arch/x86/pci/irq.c: In function ‘pirq_disable_irq’:
> > .../arch/x86/pci/irq.c:1259: error: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘mp_should_keep_irq’
> > make[3]: *** [arch/x86/pci/irq.o] Error 1
> >
> > Move them to better places.
>
> Ingo,
>
> the build failure had got addressed by a different patch
> already, albeit that patch seems far from ideal to me. I.e. I
> still think cleanup along the lines of the patch here is
> desirable, but I need to submit one that actually builds (the
> build failure the test robot encountered is a direct result of
> the clash between the two patches). I have that patch ready,
> but didn't want to submit before I got around to test it with
> 3.18-rc.
Okay, I've removed it from x86/urgent. Note that it also
generated this build failure:
./arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h:240:20: error: static declaration of
‘mp_should_keep_irq’ follows non-static declaration
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
