Use is_device_dma_coherent to check whether we need to issue cache
maintenance operations rather than checking on the existence of a
particular dma_ops function for the device.

This is correct because coherent devices don't need cache maintenance
operations - arm_coherent_dma_ops does not set the hooks that we
were previously checking for existance.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/xen/mm32.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/mm32.c b/arch/arm/xen/mm32.c
index 6153d61..d8ed359 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/mm32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/mm32.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ void xen_dma_unmap_page(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t 
handle,
                struct dma_attrs *attrs)
 
 {
-       if (!__generic_dma_ops(hwdev)->unmap_page)
+       if (is_device_dma_coherent(hwdev))
                return;
        if (dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC, attrs))
                return;
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ void xen_dma_unmap_page(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t 
handle,
 void xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev,
                dma_addr_t handle, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
 {
-       if (!__generic_dma_ops(hwdev)->sync_single_for_cpu)
+       if (is_device_dma_coherent(hwdev))
                return;
        __xen_dma_page_dev_to_cpu(hwdev, handle, size, dir);
 }
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev,
 void xen_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev,
                dma_addr_t handle, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
 {
-       if (!__generic_dma_ops(hwdev)->sync_single_for_device)
+       if (is_device_dma_coherent(hwdev))
                return;
        __xen_dma_page_cpu_to_dev(hwdev, handle, size, dir);
 }
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to