On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. September 2014, 19:13:38 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
>
> >
> > This does look much nicer, lets use this version.
> >
> > I think Peter were prefer a new clean patch that superceeds the
> > original.
> >
> > > + if (!priv->irq_tested) {
> >
> > I think the sleep and check is still needed here, the IRQ delivery
> > could race relative to the MMIO read of completion, a sleep is the
> > only way we could attempt to synchronize them..
> >
>
> So will there be a v9?
>
> Merge Window is coming up shortly, so I would like to have this sorted out
> soon ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
Hi Peter,
The v10 patch was reviewed by Jason and is ready to go. Will you be asking
James to pull this week?
Thanks,
Scot
