On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:04:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 05:53 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On newer hosts that support delayed tx interrupts,
> > we probably don't have much to gain from orphaning
> > packets early.
> >
> > Based on patch by Jason Wang.
> >
> > Note: this will likely degrade performance for hosts without event idx
> > support.  Various fallback options are available, including
> > orphaning conditionally.
> > Testing TBD.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 119 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 6b6e136..62c059d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ struct send_queue {
> >  
> >     /* Name of the send queue: output.$index */
> >     char name[40];
> > +
> > +   struct napi_struct napi;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */
> > @@ -211,15 +213,38 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue 
> > *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >     return p;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, int budget)
> > +{
> > +   struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +   unsigned int len;
> > +   struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> > +   struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> > +   int sent = 0;
> > +
> > +   while (sent < budget &&
> > +          (skb = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> > +           pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> > +
> > +           u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > +           stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> > +           stats->tx_packets++;
> > +           u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > +
> > +           dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> > +           sent++;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return sent;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >  {
> >     struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> > +   struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[vq2txq(vq)];
> >  
> > -   /* Suppress further interrupts. */
> > -   virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
> > -
> > -   /* We were probably waiting for more output buffers. */
> > -   netif_wake_subqueue(vi->dev, vq2txq(vq));
> > +   if (napi_schedule_prep(&sq->napi)) {
> > +           __napi_schedule(&sq->napi);
> > +   }
> >  }
> >  
> >  static unsigned int mergeable_ctx_to_buf_truesize(unsigned long mrg_ctx)
> > @@ -766,6 +791,37 @@ again:
> >     return received;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> > +{
> > +   struct send_queue *sq =
> > +           container_of(napi, struct send_queue, napi);
> > +   struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> > +   struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, vq2txq(sq->vq));
> > +   unsigned int r, sent = 0;
> > +
> > +again:
> > +   __netif_tx_lock(txq, smp_processor_id());
> > +   virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> > +   sent += free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, budget - sent);
> > +
> > +   if (sent < budget) {
> > +           r = virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare(sq->vq);
> 
> So even virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() was used in start_xmit(). This can
> move used index backwards to trigger unnecessary interrupts.

Good point. I'll rework this to use virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed.

virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_prepare might be nice to
reduce lock contention, but that needs to be benchmarked.


> > +           napi_complete(napi);
> > +           __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> > +           if (unlikely(virtqueue_poll(sq->vq, r)) &&
> > +               napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
> > +                   virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> > +                   __napi_schedule(napi);
> > +                   goto again;
> > +           }
> > +   } else {
> > +           __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   netif_wake_subqueue(vi->dev, vq2txq(sq->vq));
> > +   return sent;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
> >  /* must be called with local_bh_disable()d */
> >  static int virtnet_busy_poll(struct napi_struct *napi)
> > @@ -814,30 +870,12 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> >                     if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> >                             schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> >             virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
> > +           napi_enable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> >     }
> >  
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq)
> > -{
> > -   struct sk_buff *skb;
> > -   unsigned int len;
> > -   struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> > -   struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> > -
> > -   while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> > -           pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> > -
> > -           u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > -           stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> > -           stats->tx_packets++;
> > -           u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > -
> > -           dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> > -   }
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  {
> >     struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
> > @@ -902,7 +940,9 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct 
> > sk_buff *skb)
> >             sg_set_buf(sq->sg, hdr, hdr_len);
> >             num_sg = skb_to_sgvec(skb, sq->sg + 1, 0, skb->len) + 1;
> >     }
> > -   return virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, num_sg, skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +
> > +   return virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, num_sg, skb,
> > +                               GFP_ATOMIC);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > @@ -910,10 +950,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, 
> > struct net_device *dev)
> >     struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> >     int qnum = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);
> >     struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[qnum];
> > -   int err;
> > +   int err, qsize = virtqueue_get_vring_size(sq->vq);
> >  
> > -   /* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
> > -   free_old_xmit_skbs(sq);
> 
> I think we'd better keep this. Since it may the tx skb freeing not
> totally depends on the tx interrupt, delayed interrupt may work better
> without damage the latency.

Hmm ok but I think it's best to do it at the end,
after we have sent the packet.
Will update the patch.

> > +   virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> >  
> >     /* Try to transmit */
> >     err = xmit_skb(sq, skb);
> > @@ -930,22 +969,20 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, 
> > struct net_device *dev)
> >     }
> >     virtqueue_kick(sq->vq);
> >  
> > -   /* Don't wait up for transmitted skbs to be freed. */
> > -   skb_orphan(skb);
> > -   nf_reset(skb);
> > -
> >     /* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; stop the queue
> >      * before it gets out of hand.  Naturally, this wastes entries. */
> >     if (sq->vq->num_free < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> >             netif_stop_subqueue(dev, qnum);
> >             if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq))) {
> >                     /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
> > -                   free_old_xmit_skbs(sq);
> > +                   free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, qsize);
> >                     if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> >                             netif_start_subqueue(dev, qnum);
> >                             virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
> >                     }
> >             }
> > +   } else if (virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)) {
> > +           free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, qsize);
> >     }
> >  
> >     return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > @@ -1124,8 +1161,10 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
> >     /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
> >     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> >  
> > -   for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> > +   for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >             napi_disable(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> > +           napi_disable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> > +   }
> >  
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -1438,8 +1477,10 @@ static void virtnet_free_queues(struct virtnet_info 
> > *vi)
> >  {
> >     int i;
> >  
> > -   for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> > +   for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >             netif_napi_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> > +           netif_napi_del(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> > +   }
> >  
> >     kfree(vi->rq);
> >     kfree(vi->sq);
> > @@ -1593,6 +1634,8 @@ static int virtnet_alloc_queues(struct virtnet_info 
> > *vi)
> >             netif_napi_add(vi->dev, &vi->rq[i].napi, virtnet_poll,
> >                            napi_weight);
> >             napi_hash_add(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> > +           netif_napi_add(vi->dev, &vi->sq[i].napi, virtnet_poll_tx,
> > +                          napi_weight);
> >  
> >             sg_init_table(vi->rq[i].sg, ARRAY_SIZE(vi->rq[i].sg));
> >             ewma_init(&vi->rq[i].mrg_avg_pkt_len, 1, RECEIVE_AVG_WEIGHT);
> > @@ -1893,8 +1936,10 @@ static int virtnet_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >     if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> >             for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >                     napi_disable(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> > +                   napi_disable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> >                     napi_hash_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> >                     netif_napi_del(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> > +                   netif_napi_del(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> >             }
> >     }
> >  
> > @@ -1919,8 +1964,10 @@ static int virtnet_restore(struct virtio_device 
> > *vdev)
> >                     if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> >                             schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> >  
> > -           for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
> > +           for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >                     virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
> > +                   napi_enable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> > +           }
> >     }
> >  
> >     netif_device_attach(vi->dev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to