Hi,

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:29:39PM +0100, Joe.C wrote:
> From: "Joe.C" <yingjoe.c...@mediatek.com>
> 
> Add "arm,irq-domain-hierarchy" optional property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe.C <yingjoe.c...@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> index c7d2fa1..f0bb759 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ Example:
>                     <0xfff10100 0x100>;
>       };
>  
> +- arm,irq-domain-hierarchy : When this property exists, gic will be used as
> +  parent for hierarchy irq domain.

IRQ domains are a Linux internal detail, and their description doesn't
belong in the DT. So this property does not look like it should be
described in the DT.

I don't see a description of any relationship between devices here, so
it's not clear to me what this property is intended to imply.

Why do you think you need this?

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to