On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav >> <pramod.gu...@smartplayin.com> wrote: >> >> > Get rid of using return value from gpiochip_remove() as it returns >> > void. >> > >> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> >> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnu...@gmail.com> >> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com> >> > CC: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> >> > Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gu...@smartplayin.com> >> >> Already fixed in the GPIO tree. > > What does that mean? That it doesn't need fixing here?
No. I think you already ACKed the patch fixing it in the GPIO tree... There has been some misunderstanding and duplicate patches fixing already fixed problems are flying around. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
