On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:17:32AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > What is lacking is the actual .config. > > > > Sorry, attached the .config. I expected the script to auto attach it, > > but obviously it's not yet perfect and failed to attach .config in > > this case. > > Sure no problem, just figured I'd tell you. > > > > Also the times above (~285 seconds) seem to suggest userspace needs to > > > do something ? > > > > It's trinity. I'll try upgrade it, but it seems be valid for trinity > > to feed kernel with any parameters that it can accept -- unless the > > kernel completely rejects it one day. > > OK, does it make sense to augment that script you have with a trinity > parameter? Maybe have that userspace read the kernel cmdline and also > run trinity when observed? That way you can provide full > reproduction environments, which it appears you're striving towards.
The trinity binary is included in the initrd image that it downloads, and will auto run after boot up. I also plan to add trinity as a LKP test case. :) Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
