On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:03:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > What is lacking is the actual .config. > > Sorry, attached the .config. I expected the script to auto attach it, > but obviously it's not yet perfect and failed to attach .config in > this case.
Sure no problem, just figured I'd tell you. > > Also the times above (~285 seconds) seem to suggest userspace needs to > > do something ? > > It's trinity. I'll try upgrade it, but it seems be valid for trinity > to feed kernel with any parameters that it can accept -- unless the > kernel completely rejects it one day. OK, does it make sense to augment that script you have with a trinity parameter? Maybe have that userspace read the kernel cmdline and also run trinity when observed? That way you can provide full reproduction environments, which it appears you're striving towards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
