On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:12:01PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > This is being discussed on netdev at the moment. Thomas Graf is working > on a patch. > Thanks for the effort though. > > cheers, > jamal > No worries. What exactly is the point of contention on netdev? (I'm not currently following that list). My patch seems to follow the common practice for CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT, in that all references to the action member of the appropriate struct are themselves ifdef-ed. Regards, Neil
> On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 15:25, Neil Horman wrote: > > Patch to fix build break that occurs when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set. > > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > cls_fw.c | 3 ++- > > cls_route.c | 3 ++- > > cls_tcindex.c | 3 ++- > > cls_u32.c | 2 ++ > > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > -- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *Software Engineer *Red Hat, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 *http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
