On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 16:17, Neil Horman wrote: > No worries. What exactly is the point of contention on netdev? (I'm not > currently following that list). My patch seems to follow the common practice > for CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT, in that all references to the action member of the > appropriate struct are themselves ifdef-ed.
We are trying to kill appearance of any #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in the classifiers. The patch you sent is correct except it will introduce an ifdef that we are trying to kill. The current workaround is to turn on CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in the kernel build. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
