Hi Jiri,

On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:34:52 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:58:11PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> @@ -37,6 +38,9 @@ struct thread *thread__new(pid_t pid, pid_t tid)
>>              thread->cpu = -1;
>>              INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->comm_list);
>>  
>> +            if (unwind__prepare_access(thread) < 0)
>> +                    goto err_thread;
>
> So this is something we need to do only for DWARF unwind via libunwind.
> Do we want some condition to bypass this in for the rest of the cases?

Ah, you're right, we need to check that before doing this.


>
> I think we could check for symbol_conf.use_callchain and for the
> PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER|PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER sample types in evlist,
> something like:
>
>   bool has_dwarf_data_for_callchains = symbol_conf.use_callchain && 
> evlist_sample_type_has(evlist, PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER|PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)

Hmm.. it seems that it's hard to get the evlist at this point.  Maybe we
need to add a field in the symbol_conf or a global variable.. :/

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to