Setting 'flags' to zero will be certainly a misleading way to avoid
warning of 'flags' may be used uninitialized. uninitialized_var is
a correct way because the warning is a false possitive.

Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <li.xi...@freescale.com>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 92075d5..59a116d 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct 
compact_control *cc,
 {
        int nr_scanned = 0, total_isolated = 0;
        struct page *cursor, *valid_page = NULL;
-       unsigned long flags = 0;
+       unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
        bool locked = false;
        unsigned long blockpfn = *start_pfn;
 
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, 
unsigned long low_pfn,
        unsigned long nr_scanned = 0, nr_isolated = 0;
        struct list_head *migratelist = &cc->migratepages;
        struct lruvec *lruvec;
-       unsigned long flags = 0;
+       unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
        bool locked = false;
        struct page *page = NULL, *valid_page = NULL;
 
-- 
2.1.0.27.g96db324

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to