On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 08:35:42AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On 08/06/2014 12:08 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:37 AM, AKASHI Takahiro > > <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> I found a bug in my current patch (v5). When 32-bit tracer skips a system > >> call, > >> we should not update syscallno from x8 since syscallno is re-written > >> directly > >> via ptrace(PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL). > > > > Ah, yes. Will aarch64 have a PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL option, or is this > > strictly a 32-bit vs 64-bit issue? > > As discussed in a few weeks ago, aarch64 won't support PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL.
Well, I don't think anything was set in stone. If you have a compelling reason why adding the new request gives you something over setting w8 directly, then we can extend ptrace. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
