Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> writes: > The check '!PageBuddy(page) && page_count(page) == 0 && > migratetype == MIGRATE_ISOLATE' would mean the page on free processing. > Although it could go into buddy allocator within a short time, > futher operation such as isolate_freepages_range() in CMA, called after > test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(), could be failed due to this unstability > since it requires that the page is on buddy. I think that removing > this unstability is good thing.
Is that true in case of check_pages_isolated_cb ? Does that require PageBuddy to be true ? > > And, following patch makes isolated freepage has new status matched with > this condition and this check is the obstacle to that change. So remove > it. Can you quote the patch summary in the above case ? ie, something like And the followiing patch "mm/....." makes isolate freepage. -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
