On 08/08/14 12:41, Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
>> +const struct of_device_id *of_match_machine(const struct of_device_id 
>> *matches)
>> +{
>> +    const struct of_device_id *match;
>> +    struct device_node *root;
>> +
>> +    root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
>> +    if (!root)
>> +            return NULL;
>> +
>> +    match = of_match_node(matches, root);
>> +    of_node_put(root);
>> +    return match;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_match_machine);
> 
> I wonder if of_find_node_by_path("/") is somewhat overkill here. Perhaps
> simply of_node_get(of_allnodes) would be more appropriate here since the
> function is implemented in the core?

of_machine_is_compatible() uses of_find_node_by_path("/") as well, of_allnodes
seems to be only used when during iterating. So I'd prefer to have them
consistent.

-- 
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to