On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:25:25PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 08/03, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:37:37AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > > An alternative solution: > > > srcu_read_lock() before exit_notify(), srcu_read_unlock() after the last > > > preempt_disable() > > > in the do_exit, and synchronize_srcu() in rcu_tasks_kthread(). > > > > That is a good way to synchronize with the exiting tasks, and I will > > probably that that approach. > > > > I -thought- that Oleg was concerned about safely building the list to > > start with, though. > > But for_each_process_thread() under rcu_read_lock() should work except > it can miss the exiting tasks. > > So it seems that the clever Lai's trick should solve the problem.
Cool! Lai's trick seems to be doing well in early testing, so keeping fingers firmly crossed. ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/