On 2014.07.25 at 18:03 +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 25.07.2014 17:15, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> Can I ask anyone involved in this for preprocessed source and all gcc > >> command > >> line options to reproduce it, best in the form of a > >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ > >> bugreport? > > > > I've created bug 61904 for this: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61904 > > > > Note that I don't personally have a reproducer (my machine has > > gcc-4.8.3, and I don't see the same behavior), but I included the > > incorrect fair.s file that Michel sent me (which has all the command > > line options in it), and a pre-processed "fair.i" source file that I > > generated and that *should* match the configuration that was the > > source for that result. So there might be some version/configuration > > skew there between the two files, but I think they match. > > Thank you Linus for tracking down the problem and filing the bug report! > I would have done the latter as well, but I could only have channeled > your analysis anyway. :) > > > > Holler if you cannot reproduce the problem based on that. > > Likewise. I can create a GCC bugzilla account and add myself to the CC > list if that helps. > > FWIW though, the fair.i file you attached is basically identical to what > I'm getting, the only difference being a handful of file path strings.
Unfortunately I cannot reproduce the issue. Please post your complete compiler invocation while also adding -v to the options. -- Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
