On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:07 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote: > Sean Neakums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Both patches give me a successful sleep, although I had to alter the > > second to not #if 0 core99_ata100_enable -- there's another call to > > that function in pmac_feature.c's set_initial_features(). > > > > I will try to gather some power numbers. > > With the first patch, charge dropped by 33 over 52 minutes, 0.64/min. > With the second patch, charge dropped by 65 over 80 minutes, 0.81/min.
Hi ! With the same initial charge ? The problem is that the drop isn't really linear... Anyway, thanks for testing, so it would _seem_ that the Darwin way isn't as efficient as what I did ;) Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
