Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:07 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote: >> Sean Neakums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Both patches give me a successful sleep, although I had to alter the >> > second to not #if 0 core99_ata100_enable -- there's another call to >> > that function in pmac_feature.c's set_initial_features(). >> > >> > I will try to gather some power numbers. >> >> With the first patch, charge dropped by 33 over 52 minutes, 0.64/min. >> With the second patch, charge dropped by 65 over 80 minutes, 0.81/min. > > Hi ! With the same initial charge ? The problem is that the drop isn't > really linear...
Oh, fiddlesticks, that didn't occur to me. I can redo with overnight sleeps on a full charge, if you like. -- Dag vijandelijk luchtschip de huismeester is dood - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
