Sorry about the delay. On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:28:55AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > On 07/14/2014 12:05 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > Simply unfold the code of start_worker() into create_worker() and > > remove the original start_worker() and create_and_start_worker(). > > > > The only trade-off is the introduced overhead that the pool->lock > > is released and re-grabbed after the newly worker is started. > > The overhead is acceptable since the manager is slow path. > > Hi, TJ > > Will you accept this trade-off and the patch? > If so, I will rebase this patch without any dependence on other patch.
Yeap, that's fine. Thanks! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/