On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:26:26PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. Though, changes in core.c that > > increase the time in hwrng_register() or hwrng_init() may not get > > noticed by rng drivers and they may suddenly start failing for no > > apparent reason. Seems like a far stretch, though. Does anyone else > > have an opinion on this? > > Herbert, do you have any preference?
So it's only virtio-rng that's a problem, right? How about if we abuse the scan hook in virtio and move the hwrng_register there? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
