On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, John Stultz wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > @@ -335,16 +335,15 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct ti
> > */
> > static void timekeeping_forward_now(struct timekeeper *tk)
> > {
> > - cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> > + cycle_t cycle_now, delta;
> > struct clocksource *clock;
> > s64 nsec;
> >
> > clock = tk->clock;
> > cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> > - cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> > - tk->cycle_last = clock->cycle_last = cycle_now;
> > + delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, clock->cycle_last,
> > clock->mask);
>
> Errr.. Was dropping the update to tk->cycle_last and clock->cycle_last
> intended? That seems broken.
Grr, was definitely not intended.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
