Em Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:02:29PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/comm.c    |  7 +++++--
>  tools/perf/util/comm.h    |  6 ++++--
>  tools/perf/util/machine.c |  4 +++-
>  tools/perf/util/thread.c  | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  tools/perf/util/thread.h  | 10 +++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/comm.c b/tools/perf/util/comm.c
> index f9e7776..5e1e80e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/comm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/comm.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static struct comm_str *comm_str__findnew(const char *str, 
> struct rb_root *root)
>       return new;
>  }
>  
> -struct comm *comm__new(const char *str, u64 timestamp)
> +struct comm *comm__new(const char *str, u64 timestamp, bool exec)
>  {
>       struct comm *comm = zalloc(sizeof(*comm));
>  
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct comm *comm__new(const char *str, u64 timestamp)
>               return NULL;
>  
>       comm->start = timestamp;
> +     comm->exec = exec;
>  
>       comm->comm_str = comm_str__findnew(str, &comm_str_root);
>       if (!comm->comm_str) {
> @@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ struct comm *comm__new(const char *str, u64 timestamp)
>       return comm;
>  }
>  
> -int comm__override(struct comm *comm, const char *str, u64 timestamp)
> +int comm__override(struct comm *comm, const char *str, u64 timestamp, bool 
> exec)
>  {
>       struct comm_str *new, *old = comm->comm_str;
>  
> @@ -106,6 +107,8 @@ int comm__override(struct comm *comm, const char *str, 
> u64 timestamp)
>       comm_str__put(old);
>       comm->comm_str = new;
>       comm->start = timestamp;
> +     if (exec && !comm->exec)
> +             comm->exec = true;

Why do you need the !comm->exec test?

>       return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/comm.h b/tools/perf/util/comm.h
> index fac5bd5..51c10ab 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/comm.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/comm.h
> @@ -11,11 +11,13 @@ struct comm {
>       struct comm_str *comm_str;
>       u64 start;
>       struct list_head list;
> +     bool exec;
>  };
>  
>  void comm__free(struct comm *comm);
> -struct comm *comm__new(const char *str, u64 timestamp);
> +struct comm *comm__new(const char *str, u64 timestamp, bool exec);
>  const char *comm__str(const struct comm *comm);
> -int comm__override(struct comm *comm, const char *str, u64 timestamp);
> +int comm__override(struct comm *comm, const char *str, u64 timestamp,
> +                bool exec);
>  
>  #endif  /* __PERF_COMM_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index 0fa93c1..2513204 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -360,11 +360,13 @@ int machine__process_comm_event(struct machine 
> *machine, union perf_event *event
>       struct thread *thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine,
>                                                       event->comm.pid,
>                                                       event->comm.tid);
> +     bool exec = event->header.misc & PERF_RECORD_MISC_COMM_EXEC;
>  
>       if (dump_trace)
>               perf_event__fprintf_comm(event, stdout);
>  
> -     if (thread == NULL || thread__set_comm(thread, event->comm.comm, 
> sample->time)) {
> +     if (thread == NULL ||
> +         __thread__set_comm(thread, event->comm.comm, sample->time, exec)) {
>               dump_printf("problem processing PERF_RECORD_COMM, skipping 
> event.\n");
>               return -1;
>       }
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.c b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> index ca94295..149e417 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ struct thread *thread__new(pid_t pid, pid_t tid)
>                       goto err_thread;
>  
>               snprintf(comm_str, 32, ":%d", tid);
> -             comm = comm__new(comm_str, 0);
> +             comm = comm__new(comm_str, 0, false);
>               free(comm_str);
>               if (!comm)
>                       goto err_thread;
> @@ -113,19 +113,33 @@ struct comm *thread__comm(const struct thread *thread)
>       return list_first_entry(&thread->comm_list, struct comm, list);
>  }
>  
> +struct comm *thread__exec_comm(const struct thread *thread)
> +{
> +     struct comm *comm, *last = NULL;
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(comm, &thread->comm_list, list) {
> +             if (comm->exec)
> +                     return comm;
> +             last = comm;
> +     }
> +
> +     return last;
> +}
> +
>  /* CHECKME: time should always be 0 if event aren't ordered */
> -int thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str, u64 timestamp)
> +int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str, u64 timestamp,
> +                    bool exec)
>  {
>       struct comm *new, *curr = thread__comm(thread);
>       int err;
>  
>       /* Override latest entry if it had no specific time coverage */
> -     if (!curr->start) {
> -             err = comm__override(curr, str, timestamp);
> +     if (!curr->start && !curr->exec) {
> +             err = comm__override(curr, str, timestamp, exec);
>               if (err)
>                       return err;
>       } else {
> -             new = comm__new(str, timestamp);
> +             new = comm__new(str, timestamp, exec);
>               if (!new)
>                       return -ENOMEM;
>               list_add(&new->list, &thread->comm_list);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.h b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
> index 9de0629..b4269af 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
> @@ -38,9 +38,17 @@ static inline void thread__exited(struct thread *thread)
>       thread->dead = true;
>  }
>  
> -int thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *comm, u64 timestamp);
> +int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *comm, u64 
> timestamp,
> +                    bool exec);
> +static inline int thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *comm,
> +                                u64 timestamp)
> +{
> +     return __thread__set_comm(thread, comm, timestamp, false);
> +}
> +

So this is nice, you leave the existing function, setting exec to false,
so that you don't have to change the existing codepaths where it is not
from 'exec', and provide a __ prefixed variant where 'exec' can be set.

Why not to do the same thing for comm__new() ? No uses, i.e. in all
cases you will need to pass 'exec' as a variable?

I thought about doing the same thing for that machine__findnew_thread,
i.e. provide a variant where tid and pid is passed and one where just
the tid is passed, because the pid is unknown.

BTW, I'll update my perf/core branch with the set of patches that I
merged, so that you can have where to look for a consolidated tree with
the things already processed.

- Arnaldo

>  int thread__comm_len(struct thread *thread);
>  struct comm *thread__comm(const struct thread *thread);
> +struct comm *thread__exec_comm(const struct thread *thread);
>  const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread);
>  void thread__insert_map(struct thread *thread, struct map *map);
>  int thread__fork(struct thread *thread, struct thread *parent, u64 
> timestamp);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to