On Tuesday March 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So here's a first cut at how this 2.6 -stable release process is going > to work that Chris and I have come up with. Does anyone have any > problems/issues/questions with this?
One rule that I thought would make sense, but that I don't see listed is: - must fix a regression If some problem was in 2.6.X and is still there in 2.6.X+1, then there is no great rush to fix it for 2.6.(X+1).1, it can wait for 2.6.(X+2). Security issues could be an exception to this, or it could be seen that the publication of a security vulnerability causes a regression which needs to be fixed... NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
