Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Brown wrote: > >> If a data corruption bug has been there for 10 weeks without being >> noticed, then the real risk is not that great. We are calling it >> "-release", not "-hardened". > > I disagree. If there's a simple, obvious, small fix that passes all > the other criteria, it should go into -stable ASAP after passing > review. Then the -stable maintainers will push the fix to > Andrew/Linux, and it will go into the next 2.6.x.
No way, it needs to go into mainline first and then maybe later into stable. Doing stable first would lead to code drift because a lot of people would only care about stable and we would be back in the bad old days when older kernels had more fixes than newer ones. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
