On Thu, 03 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 03.07.2014, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Maxime Coquelin: > > I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17. > > For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the > > dt-bindings header file in the STi tree. > > > > If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might > > have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch. > > Philipp, does that sound reasonable? > > Patch 4 depends on patch 1 for the header. My tree is still empty, how > about I take the first two, and you merge that branch and then take 3 > and 4 on top?
That approach sounds reasonable. Once you've applied the patches can you tag the branch and provide Maxime with a pull-request please Philipp? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
