On 07/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > And this naturally suggests that rcu_read_lock_held() should be uninlined > too (and rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), but this needs another patch). > > But I still can't understand the difference reported by "size vmlinux", > > - 5541731 3014560 14757888 23314179 > + 5513182 3026848 14757888 23297918 > > it removes 28K from .text, but somehow it adds 12K to .data. I do not > see any difference in .data when I compare individual .o files before/ > after this patch.
OK, it doesn't add to .data. This is because of INIT_TASK_DATA(THREAD_SIZE) in vmlinux.lds.S, see the changelog. If you think this makes sense I will will spam you again. We can also uninline rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), mostly for consistency. But this needs a separate change. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
