Lee, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> We know how many bytes the EC should be sending us (which is also the >> number of bytes transferred) and also how many bytes the EC actually >> wanted to send to us. When computing the checksum and copying back >> data let's make sure we take the lesser of the two of those. We'll >> also complain if the EC tried to send us too many bytes. The EC >> sending us too few bytes is legit for when we send the EC an invalid >> command. >> >> This is based on similar code in cros_ec_spi. >> >> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> >> --- >> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > Is this patch orthogonal i.e. can it be applied without the other two > patches?
Yes. If patch 3/3 had worked out then it would have required patch #1 for proper functioning and patch #2 (this patch) to avoid an ugly error message in the log. ...but patch #1 and this patch both can stand on their own and can be applied. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
