* Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes. In kernel "damage control" is an optional extra not a necessity
> > with this solution. Not so sure about with the RT LSB solution though.
>
> This has one advantage over RT LSM in that area, which is it places an
> upper bound on the priority (in control of the admin). So it's
> possible to save some space for damage control in the top few prio
> slots.
it's not just purely for damage control - there have been requests of
being able to 'partition' the RT priorities space between applications.
(It's an afterthought but nice nevertheless.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
