Hi!
> > The point is that it's happening anyway. See Andres' -as tree which
> > is the basis for the Debian vendor kernel. Getting that up to an
> > official status as 2.6.x.y would be very nice (and having it on
> > linux.bkbits.net)
>
> IMHO it is nowhere near conservative enough (or at times complete
> enough) to be a 2.6.x.y kernel. In some respects -ac is closer but it
> also isn't as conservative as a real 2.6.x.y should be.
>
> 2.6.x.y needs several people to keep it tight and to ensure there is
> always cover on a security fix.
Eh?
Like you add security fix and then some formatting change to hide it?
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
