On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 23:15:03 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:28:52PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: >> >I've watched you periodically announce "hey, I'm doing an update for >> >FC3/FC2, please test" on the mail list, and a handful of people go test. >> >If we could convince many of the the less risk-averse but lazy users to >> >grab kernels automatically from updates/3/testing/ or updates/3/unstable/ >> >as part of "yum update", and have a way to manage the plethora of (even >> >daily) kernel updates by removing old unused kernels, then we'd only >> >have to convince them *once* to set up their YUM repos, and then get them >> >to poweroff or reboot [or use a Xen domain] occasionally. :-) >> >> >> Tangent: I would like to see requests-for-testing for FC kernels on LKML. >> >> If people announce -ac/-as/-aa/-ck/etc. kernels on LKML, why not distro >> kernels? > > Debian unstable currently contains only for kernel 2.6.8 (which is AFAIK > still the main kernel in Debian unstable although there are also 2.6.10 > sources and 2.6.10 kernel images on some architectures) for eight > different architectures - many of them containing or depending on their > own patches. >
There's also no other (suitable) place to announce kernel trees. Debian kernels get announced on various debian-related lists; I'd imagine FC kernels have the same thing. The only place to announce non-distro trees is lkml (and I've had requests for an -as specific announce list, I haven't haven't found the time to get something going). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
