3.13.11.4 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com>

commit 77f300b198f93328c26191b52655ce1b62e202cf upstream.

wq_update_unbound_numa() failure path has the following two bugs.

- alloc_unbound_pwq() is called without holding wq->mutex; however, if
  the allocation fails, it jumps to out_unlock which tries to unlock
  wq->mutex.

- The function should switch to dfl_pwq on failure but didn't do so
  after alloc_unbound_pwq() failure.

Fix it by regrabbing wq->mutex and jumping to use_dfl_pwq on
alloc_unbound_pwq() failure.

Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Fixes: 4c16bd327c74 ("workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound 
workqueues")
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <ka...@canonical.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a8381cf..6b1b746 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4093,7 +4093,8 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct 
workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
        if (!pwq) {
                pr_warning("workqueue: allocation failed while updating NUMA 
affinity of \"%s\"\n",
                           wq->name);
-               goto out_unlock;
+               mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+               goto use_dfl_pwq;
        }
 
        /*
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to