On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:28:07AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> pci_wait_for_pending() uses word access, so we shouldn't be passing
> an offset that is only byte aligned.  Use the control register offset
> instead, shifting the mask to match.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

Applied with Gavin's ack to for-linus for v3.16, thanks!

> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 759475e..81012ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -3109,8 +3109,13 @@ static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
>       if (probe)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     /* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */
> -     if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP))
> +     /*
> +      * Wait for Transaction Pending bit to clear.  A word-aligned test
> +      * is used, so we use the conrol offset rather than status and shift
> +      * the test bit to match.
> +      */
> +     if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_CTRL,
> +                              PCI_AF_STATUS_TP << 8))
>               goto clear;
>  
>       dev_err(&dev->dev, "transaction is not cleared; "
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to