On 06/03, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > You know, this code could use some comments. I may send you a patch, > because that __lock_task_sighand() is doing a lot of subtle things and > there's not a single comment explaining it :-(
Yes, agreed. Not only SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU is not obvious, local_irq_save() is not clear at all. The latter already has a doc patch from Paul, I'll try to add more comments on top once I see that patch in Linus's tree. But I would be happy if you send the patch ;) And this reminds me... I still think that __lock_task_sighand() should be de-uglified. I already sent the patch, probably I'll resend it. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
