On 06/03, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct arch_uprobe {
> > struct {
> > u8 fixups;
> > u8 ilen;
> > - } def;
> > + } dflt;
>
> Pls lts nt use slly abbrvtns, ok?
OK. As I said in the previous dicussion, I agree with any naming.
> How about arch_uprobe->default?
And this is how it was named when I wrote this code. Unfortunately gcc
dislikes this name ;) So I renamed it to ->def. Then I was asked to
rename it and I agree, ->def doesn't look good.
Could you suggest something better?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
