On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/03/14 03:15, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing > > failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a > > check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel > > Humpherys for coming up with the pattern initially. > > > > Cc: Mitchel Humpherys <mitch...@codeaurora.org> > > Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> > > Cc: Gilles Muller <gilles.mul...@lip6.fr> > > Cc: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.pa...@imag.fr> > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org> > > Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> > > > > --- > > > > v3: Removed unneeded rule bad_of_table. Placed * in context rule on the > > closing brace; putting it on the field caused all fields to be marked. > > > > > These seem like only minor changes. Why was my authorship removed?
Probably because I don't know how to provide a new vesion of the patch properly. What should I have done? There were quite a lot of modifications. It seemed easier to just send a complete new version. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
