On Sat, 31 May 2014, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> One of my machines got the lockdep report below when booting a kernel
> that contained these patches. 

I think this is just a lacking annotation.

We do nest dentry d_lock locking, and in order to avoid ABBA deadlocks the 
rule is that we lock things in topological order (parent dentry first). 
lock_parent() is very careful about that, but doesn't actually tell 
lockdep about it.

This trivial oneliner should fix it.

                        Linus

---
 fs/dcache.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index bce851dc03ef..be2bea834bf4 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ again:
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();
        if (parent != dentry)
-               spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+               spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
        else
                parent = NULL;
        return parent;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to