Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I ran the lmbench with three different kernels with the fork > connector patch I just sent. Results are attached at the end of the mail > and there are three different lines which are: > > o First line is a linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-cnfork > o Second line is a linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1 > o Third line is a linux-2.6.11-rc4-mm1-cnfork with a user space > application. The user space application listened during 15h > and received 6496 messages. > > Each test has been ran only once. > > ... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Host OS Mhz null null open slct sig sig fork exec sh > > call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc > proc > --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- > ---- > account Linux 2.6.11- 2765 0.17 0.26 3.57 4.19 16.9 0.51 2.31 162. 629. > 2415 > account Linux 2.6.11- 2765 0.16 0.26 3.56 4.17 17.6 0.50 2.30 163. 628. > 2417 > account Linux 2.6.11- 2765 0.16 0.27 3.67 4.25 17.6 0.51 2.28 176. 664. > 2456
This is the interesting bit, yes? 5-10% slowdown on fork is expected, but why was exec slower? What does "The user space application listened during 15h" mean? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
