On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 14:01 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:09:55PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 05/21/2014 02:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:41:58PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > >> Hello Peter/Ingo, > > >> > > >> Would you please consider reviewing the first four patches in this patch > > >> series > > >> which changes the generic perf kernel and perf tools code. Andi Kleen > > >> and Stephane > > >> Eranian have already reviewed these changes. The rest of the patch > > >> series is related > > >> to powerpc and being reviewed by Michael Ellerman/Ben. > > >> > > > > > > If they land in my inbox I might have a look. > > > > > > > Sent. > > Thanks, they look fine to me, although 1/x can use a lightly longer > changelog, making it explicit its a filter for conditional branches. > > How do people want this routed? Should I take all patches through tip, > or do I ask Ingo to create a special perf/cond branch which includes the > first 4 patches which can be merged into whatever ppc branch and the > rest then go on top in the ppc tree?
Hi Peter, Can you take just the first 4 in your tree please. I asked Anshuman to just send those 4 but he & I seem to have miscommunicated on that. We only depend on patch 1 in order for the powerpc parts to build, so I think we'll just merge that into the powerpc tree and it should merge fine when it hits next. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
