On 05/21/2014 05:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:09:55PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 05/21/2014 02:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:41:58PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> Hello Peter/Ingo, >>>> >>>> Would you please consider reviewing the first four patches in this patch >>>> series >>>> which changes the generic perf kernel and perf tools code. Andi Kleen and >>>> Stephane >>>> Eranian have already reviewed these changes. The rest of the patch series >>>> is related >>>> to powerpc and being reviewed by Michael Ellerman/Ben. >>>> >>> >>> If they land in my inbox I might have a look. >>> >> >> Sent. > > Thanks, they look fine to me, although 1/x can use a lightly longer > changelog, making it explicit its a filter for conditional branches. > > How do people want this routed? Should I take all patches through tip, > or do I ask Ingo to create a special perf/cond branch which includes the > first 4 patches which can be merged into whatever ppc branch and the > rest then go on top in the ppc tree? >
Peter, Thanks for considering the patchset. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
