Hello, Bartlomiej.
Hello, Jeff.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 05:14:55PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 28 February 2005 16:24, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > >
> > > Nope, it works just fine because REQ_DRIVE_TASK used only
> > > no-data protocol, please check task_no_data_intr().
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, I missed that. IDE really has a lot of ways to finish a
> > command, doesn't it? hdio.txt is gonna look ugly. :-)
>
> Yep but it was a lot more "fun" when there were three PIO codepaths. ;-)
>
> hdio.txt doesn't need to know about driver internals so no problem here.
>
I was talking about the TASKFILE ioctl IN register result.
> > >
> > >> IMHO, this flag-to-get-result-registers thing is way too subtle. How
> > >>about keeping old behavior by just not copying out register outputs in
> > >>ide_taskfile_ioctl() in applicable cases instead of not reading
> > >>registers when ending commands? That is, unless there's some
> > >>noticeable performance impacts I'm not aware of.
> > >
> > >
> > > This would miss whole point of not _reading_ these registers (IO is slow).
> > > IMHO new flags denoting {in,out} registers should be added (to
> > > <linux/ata.h>
> > > to share them with libata) so new code can be sane and old flags would map
> > > on new flags when needed.
> >
> > Please do it.
> >
> > Or, let me know what you have in mind (added fields, flag names,
> > etc...); then, I'll do it. I think we also need to hear Jeff's opinion
> > as things need to be added to ata.h.
>
> I was thinking about:
>
> * adding ATA_TFLAG_{IN,OUT}_xxx flags (there is enough free
> place for all flags in ->flags field of struct ata_taskfile)
> * teaching flagged_taskfile() about these flags and mapping ->tf_out_flags
> onto ATA_TFLAG_OUT_xxx (simple mapping no need to move ->tf_out_flags
> to ide_taskfile_ioctl() etc. - no risk of breaking something)
> * moving flagged taskfile writing to ide_tf_load_discrete() helper
> * adding ide_tf_read_discrete() helper for use by ide_end_drive_cmd()
> and mapping ->tf_in_flags onto ATA_TFLAG_IN_xxx (ditto)
>
> If you like this plan feel free to implement it.
> I'm also open for better ideas, comments etc.
So, how do you like the following set of TFLAG's?
/* struct ata_taskfile flags */
/* The following six flags are used by IDE driver to control register IO. */
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_LBA48 = (1 << 0), /* enable 48-bit LBA and HOB out */
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_ADDR = (1 << 1), /* enable out to nsect/lba regs */
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_DEVICE = (1 << 2), /* enable out to device reg */
ATA_TFLAG_IN_LBA48 = (1 << 3), /* enable 48-bit LBA and HOB in */
ATA_TFLAG_IN_ADDR = (1 << 4), /* enable in from nsect/lba regs */
ATA_TFLAG_IN_DEVICE = (1 << 5), /* enable in from device reg */
/* These three aggregate flags are used by libata, as it doesn't
really need to optimize register INs */
ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 = (ATA_TFLAG_OUT_LBA48 | ATA_TFLAG_IN_LBA48),
ATA_TFLAG_ISADDR = (ATA_TFLAG_OUT_ADDR | ATA_TFLAG_IN_ADDR),
ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE = (ATA_TFLAG_OUT_DEVICE | ATA_TFLAG_IN_DEVICE),
ATA_TFLAG_WRITE = (1 << 6), /* data dir */
/* The rest of TFLAGs are only for implementing ioctl direct drive
commands in the IDE driver. DO NOT use in other places. */
ATA_TFLAG_IO_16BIT = (1 << 11),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_FEATURE = (1 << 12),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_NSECT = (1 << 13),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_LBAL = (1 << 14),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_LBAM = (1 << 15),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_LBAH = (1 << 16),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_FEATURE = (1 << 17),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_NSECT = (1 << 18),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_LBAL = (1 << 19),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_LBAM = (1 << 20),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_LBAH = (1 << 21),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_FEATURE = (1 << 22),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_NSECT = (1 << 23),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_LBAL = (1 << 24),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_LBAM = (1 << 25),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_LBAH = (1 << 26),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_HOB_FEATURE = (1 << 27),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_HOB_NSECT = (1 << 28),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_HOB_LBAL = (1 << 29),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_HOB_LBAM = (1 << 30),
ATA_TFLAG_IN_HOB_LBAH = (1 << 31),
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_MASK = 0x007ff000,
ATA_TFLAG_IN_MASK = 0xffc00000,
ATA_TFLAG_OUT_IN_MASK = (ATA_TFLAG_OUT_MASK | ATA_TFLAG_IN_MASK),
ATA_TFLAG_{OUT|IN}_{LBA48|ADDR|DEVICE} should provide enough
granuality for fs/internal requests without much hassle, and
individual IO/OUT flags will only be used to implement ioctls in
separate IN/OUT functions, something like ide_{load|read}_ioctl_task().
Would using more specific prefix for ioctl flags - like
ATA_TFLAG_IOC_{IN|OUT}_* - be better?
libata will work as it works currently, but if optimizing out
register INs can help, converting to use IN/OUT flags should be easy.
Please let me know what you guys think.
Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
