On Thu, 15 May 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > > trinity$ MALLOC_CHECK_=0 ./trinity -xinit_module -xreboot -xshutdown
> -xunshare -xnfsservctl -xclock_nanosleep -xuselib -xumount -xmount -m --quiet
> -C 400 -l off -xmremap
> > > >
> > > > [watchdog] kernel became tainted! (512/0) Last seed was 4072360471
> > > >
> > > > [15908.562512] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > [15908.567245] WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 3312 at
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/kernel/signal.c:3060 do_rt_tgsigqueueinfo+0xb4/0xc0()
> > > >
> > > > This is apparently a very common thing to hit according to google.
> > >
> > > Well, it warns about an argument received from userland, so nothing fishy
> > > going on as far as kernel consistency is concerned if that's what you
> mean.
> >
> > I hadn't looked that far.. I just manged to hit it two times in a row
> > while waiting for my bug to trigger.
>
> There's a ton of 'noise' like this that fuzzing turns up.
> I've been collecting some of the stuff to shut it up..
>
> http://codemonkey.org.uk/junk/silence-fuzz-testing-noise.patch
> http://codemonkey.org.uk/junk/silence-noisy-deprecated-warnings-while-fuzzing.patch
>
> I'm of the opinion that a user-triggerable WARN is a bug, but aparently
> not everyone else feels that way.
I agree. It returns -EPERM which is the right answer
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
