On 15 May 2014 11:00, Inderpal Singh <inderpa...@samsung.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> On 15 May 2014 10:22, Inderpal Singh <inderpa...@samsung.com> wrote: >> >>> What i am saying that "what if we are not going to re-use again ? " >> >> That's what I said: >> >> Yes, it will keep occupying some space but there is only one instance >> of that per 'cluster' and is very much affordable instead of building it >> again.. >> >> So, we may not need to free it. > > Its not just about cpufreq. There may be others using OPPs as well. > For example devfreq.
And who is stopping these to use the already built ones? Exactly for this reason I have been saying that lets not free OPPs already built. Devfreq can simply use the ones built by cpufreq, even if cpufreq isn't using it anymore. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
