On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:54:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:31:02PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available.
>
> I really don't think that spamming dmesg every time a filesystem is
> frozen or thawed is a good idea. This happens a *lot* when systems
> are using snapshots, and for the most part nobody cares about
> freeze/thaw cycles because they almost always work just fine.
The problems people are worried about are when there is freezing and
unfreezing taking place in combination with a machine-level
suspend/resume cycle, no? What if we only spammed dmesg when doing a
suspend/resume?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
