Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2014-05-09 04:11:49)
> +struct clk_ops ar100_ops = {
> +       .recalc_rate = ar100_recalc_rate,
> +       .determine_rate = ar100_determine_rate,
> +       .set_parent = ar100_set_parent,
> +       .get_parent = ar100_get_parent,
> +       .set_rate = ar100_set_rate,
> +};

I might be having a brain fart, but is there a valid case for having
both a .recalc_rate and a .determine_rate? I believe that the former
will never be used and the latter will always be used by the clock
framework core.

Regards,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to