Quoting Boris BREZILLON (2014-05-09 04:11:49) > +struct clk_ops ar100_ops = { > + .recalc_rate = ar100_recalc_rate, > + .determine_rate = ar100_determine_rate, > + .set_parent = ar100_set_parent, > + .get_parent = ar100_get_parent, > + .set_rate = ar100_set_rate, > +};
I might be having a brain fart, but is there a valid case for having both a .recalc_rate and a .determine_rate? I believe that the former will never be used and the latter will always be used by the clock framework core. Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/